data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/965fa/965faec208ffc2bdef9c432c3d7d7f1590bc06c0" alt=""
1907: "A Mistaken Idea about Electric Light" ad; also, demos of electric stove.
1919: Various ads pleading with Ypsilantians to have their houses wired, then buy: electric washing machine, grill, iron, sewing machine, toasters, "cleaner."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47ccf/47ccf05bb6e19897344fd58067b16be45d0a9cac" alt=""
But it's not till 1956 that the ad for an electric dryer comes along. This can't be because the technology was difficult--if anything, it seems simpler to me. A spinny thing and a hot air thing, right? And lint trap. So why didn't the electric companies dream this up and create a need for it sooner? My guess would be that hanging wash outside is really less of a problem than the problems solved by the earlier appliances.
Do wonder though: why were Ypsilantians so slllloooowwwww to adopt electric STOVES in particular? Seems like a trivial question...but as James Mann says, "The history is in the footnotes."
5 comments :
I can speculate on several reasons for resistance to electric stoves:
1. The wood/coal stove is also a heater. Would it have been the only source of heat for some homes? Would that imply the need to install some other form of heater - a big expense!
2. The ad is certainly fighting the perception that electric cooking is expensive. Was coal or wood that much cheaper per BTU than electricity?
3. Inertia - both cultural and literal. Those cast iron stoves were big, and somebody had to move them...
Fun with numbers: the ad says that a laundry basket used to cost about $2.50 in 1956. That's $19.47 in today's dollars. A quick check online finds laundry hampers from about $10 up to $30, so apparently laundry hamper prices increase roughly according to inflation.
Today, it costs about $0.30 to dry a load of clothes with an electric dryer. That means you could dry about 65 loads for the $19.47 given above. So, electricity must be cheaper these days than it used to be (assuming dryer efficiencies haven't changed much--they probably have increased a little bit, but not much).
Anonymous: Ooh, that's just the sort of economic info I enjoy! It makes sense that electricity is cheaper now, due to economies of scale and more efficient wiring, &c. Neato.
jml: I bet it WAS the only source of heat for many homes. Our gas stove certainly makes a big difference in our (old, drafty) home in winter. Good point!
Yes, I agree...I've seen several ads that in effect say, "Electricity is not more expensive--really! No, really!" They protest a bit too much--I'd love to know if coal/wood was cheaper per BTU. I bet they were.
Inertia is another good suggestion.
I also realized that the stove would represent one of the hugest and more expensive appliances in most homes, and people would naturally try to use it as long as possible. I also think the standard of living was lower, by and large, than today--so, even less money to lavish on a new stove "when our old one works just fine."
What a great web log. I spend hours on the net reading blogs, about tons of various subjects. I have to first of all give praise to whoever created your theme and second of all to you for writing what i can only describe as an fabulous article. I honestly believe there is a skill to writing articles that only very few posses and honestly you got it. The combining of demonstrative and upper-class content is by all odds super rare with the astronomic amount of blogs on the cyberspace.
Post a Comment